<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>txGarage &#187; first drive</title>
	<atom:link href="http://txgarage.com/tag/first-drive/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://txgarage.com</link>
	<description>News, Thoughts, Reviews - by Texas Car Enthusiasts!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 19:37:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Full Review of the 2012 Chevrolet Traverse</title>
		<link>http://txgarage.com/2012/02/full-review-of-the-2012-chevrolet-traverse/</link>
		<comments>http://txgarage.com/2012/02/full-review-of-the-2012-chevrolet-traverse/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 17:02:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam Moore</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Car Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Chevrolet Traverse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3 row]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[7 passenger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[driving]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[first drive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[inside]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mini-van]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[passenger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[row]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[traverse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[traverse review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://txgarage.com/?p=3441</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Driving a big, 3-row SUV is usually a telling sign that the driver has a larger family and needs the extra seating to pack everyone in one vehicle. This isn’t always true in Texas, as you’ll see many people driving &#8230; <a href="http://txgarage.com/2012/02/full-review-of-the-2012-chevrolet-traverse/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_3445" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 590px"><img src="http://txgarage.com/images/2012/02/2012-Chevy-Traverse-top.jpg" alt="2012 Chevrolet Traverse LTZ reviewed by txGarage" title="2012-Chevy-Traverse-top" width="580" height="252" class="size-full wp-image-3445" /><p class="wp-caption-text">2012 Chevrolet Traverse LTZ reviewed by txGarage</p></div>
<div class="left1">
Driving a big, 3-row SUV is usually a telling sign that the driver has a larger family and needs the extra seating to pack everyone in one vehicle. This isn’t always true in Texas, as you’ll see many people driving Tahoe’s or Expedition’s and never carry more than 3 or 4 people at a time, but this is no Tahoe. The car we are reviewing this week is the 2012 Chevrolet Traverse. It’s built as a crossover SUV, and not an all out big SUV built on the frame of a truck.<span id="more-3441"></span></p>
<p>This is a popular segment here in Texas, and I can see why. The convenience of having all that room in a smaller, more efficient package is appealing to a lot of families. Before big crossover SUV’s, your only option was to get a mini-van. Mini-vans are still very popular and have their plus sides over crossovers, but come on, it’s a mini-van.</p>
<p>Let’s get personal for a minute. As many of my readers know, I have a larger family. I’ve driven many 3-row SUV’s and have owned a Suzuki XL-7, so I know what the family guy is looking for in his family hauler. The big players like the Tahoe, Suburban, Expedition, and others are great looking and masculine SUV’s, but they are inevitably expensive and heavy, and thus, they drink a massive amount of fuel. If it is at all feasible to your budget to buy one of these SUV’s, that’s what you, as a guy, should buy. Crossovers are notoriously deemed “soccer mom” cars, and are not seen as being able to be very masculine. So how does the Traverse stack up? Is it too “soccer mom-ish” for the average Texas man to buy? Did it do well with my family? Read on and we’ll see.
</p></div>
<div class="right1">
<strong>Is it big enough inside?</strong></p>
<p>The simple answer is yes. This is one of the biggest crossover SUV’s you can buy. Its seating configuration is two seats up front, two captains chairs in the middle, and a bench for three in the rear. With most 7 passenger crossovers, the third seat seems like more of an afterthought. You have the regular bench seat that is found in the SUV’s 5-passnger model and another pair of seats is thrown where all your groceries should go. This is fine as long as that 3rd row isn’t needed very often, but when you use it everyday and plan on keeping this SUV as the children grow, it can get old. When we reviewed the <a href="http://txgarage.com/2011/09/2011-mitsubishi-outlander-gt-full-review/" title="2011 Mitsubishi Outlander GT full review">Mitsubishi Outlander GT</a>, for example, the third-row might as well have been a few pieces of cardboard thrown in the rear of the SUV. The Suzuki XL-7 I owned, that was at one time built on the same platform as the Traverse, had the same problem. Getting to the 3rd row was troublesome and there was no way anyone over 12 would fit comfortably back there.</p>
<p>So the Traverse has it on size. Seating is comfortable and easy to get into by just about anyone of any size, and when you have passengers in that 3rd row, you can still manage to load up the rear with groceries or whatever you might be hauling.
</p></div>
<div style="clear:both;">
<img src="http://a5.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/421057_314921545220860_163259573720392_847635_1232812123_n.jpg" width="250px"> <img src="http://a7.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc7/422414_314921561887525_163259573720392_847636_331540461_n.jpg" width="250px"><br />
<br />
<img src="http://a3.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/427746_314921708554177_163259573720392_847641_86733026_n.jpg" width="250px"> <img src="http://a4.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/395693_314920091887672_163259573720392_847618_23018739_n.jpg" width="250px"></p>
<p>All this space comes at a price though. The Suzuki XL-7 I owned was loaded with leather seats, a sunroof, a built in DVD player, and more. It cost me $28,000. The Mitsubishi Outlander GT we reviewed was also packed full of goodies, but had a MSRP of just over $32,000. Our fully decked out Traverse will hit your pocketbook at $43,895. That seems like a lot, and quite frankly, it is. You could pick up the GMC Acadia for the same kind of money. To be fair though, the <a href="http://txgarage.com/2011/09/2011-ford-explorer-reviewed/" title="2011 Ford Explorer reviewed">Ford Explorer we reviewed</a>, that was a 3-row and decked out, cost even more! The more cramped Explorer’s MSRP was just over $45,000. So for the size of this thing and the amenities we got, it’s not a horrible price compared to the market.</p>
<p>Even though this was a top of the line Traverse with leather, heated seats, rear DVD entertainment system, navigation, and the works, it never really felt premium. The leather was nice, and better than that which was in the Suzuki XL-7 I owned, but much of the other items in the car seemed to still be lifted straight from the 2007 model. The dash and steering wheel controls were laid out almost the exact same as my 07 Suzuki. I’d have to say that the interior in the $23k <a href="http://txgarage.com/2012/01/full-review-of-the-2012-chevrolet-cruze-by-txgarge/" title="Full Review of the 2012 Chevrolet Cruze by txGarge">Chevrolet Cruze</a> was much nicer and a more premium feel than this almost $44k SUV.</p>
<p>So what about the looks? The Traverse looks pretty good. It looks big, and it is big. It’s got stylish lines and the now unmistakable Chevrolet front grille. But when it comes down to it, it still has a more “mini-van-ish” look. This is a great look for the true “soccer mom” looking to haul her kids back and forth, but as a man, I’d probably look at the GMC Acadia.</p>
<p>We’ve established that I have a big family, and I’m actually in the market for this type of vehicle as I reviewed it, so here are my final thoughts. I do like this SUV; it rides good, it has plenty of room, it’s easy to get in and out of, and even though the interior isn’t as premium as I’d want for the price, it’s something I could easily deal with. After driving this Traverse, it’s helped me move another vehicle up on my list. Not the Traverse, but the GMC Acadia. The Acadia is built on the same platform and has the same seating arrangement and the same quality of interior, but for a man driving an SUV in Texas, I like the looks of the Acadia more. </p>
<p>For more Photos check out our photo galleries on <a href="http://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.314919155221099.71841.163259573720392&#038;type=1" title="txGarage on Facebook - 2012 Chevrolet Traverse photo gallery" target="_blank">Facebook</a> and <a href="https://plus.google.com/photos/114211521143782375203/albums/5706415979155839665" title="txGarage on Google Plus - Photo Gallery of the 2012 Chevrolet Traverse " target="_blank">Google+</a><br />
Also don&#8217;t forget to head over to <a href="http://youtube.com/texasgarage" title="txGarage on YouTube - 2012 Chevrolet Traverse video review" target="_blank">YouTube</a> and Subscribe and watch the video!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://txgarage.com/2012/02/full-review-of-the-2012-chevrolet-traverse/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sonic the Turbo – Review of the 2012 Chevrolet Sonic 1LT TURBO</title>
		<link>http://txgarage.com/2012/01/sonic-the-turbo-review-of-the-2012-chevrolet-sonic-1lt-turbo/</link>
		<comments>http://txgarage.com/2012/01/sonic-the-turbo-review-of-the-2012-chevrolet-sonic-1lt-turbo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 23:53:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam Moore</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Car Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1.4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[all new]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[car review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chevrolet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chevy sonic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[first drive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[horsepower]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Racing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sonic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sonic review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sonic turbo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[time attack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[turbo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://txgarage.com/?p=3351</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First and foremost, let’s do some house cleaning. The Sonic is a replacement for the Chevrolet Aveo. Don’t look on this site for an Aveo review, because there isn’t one. I have driven a few versions of the Aveo. Back &#8230; <a href="http://txgarage.com/2012/01/sonic-the-turbo-review-of-the-2012-chevrolet-sonic-1lt-turbo/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_3390" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 610px"><img src="http://txgarage.com/images/2012/01/2010-Chevorolet-Sonic-turbo.jpg" alt="2012 Chevrolet Sonic turbo - reviewed by txGarage" title="2010-Chevorolet-Sonic-turbo" width="600" height="305" class="size-full wp-image-3390" /><p class="wp-caption-text">2012 Chevrolet Sonic turbo - reviewed by txGarage</p></div>
<p>First and foremost, let’s do some house cleaning.  The Sonic is a replacement for the Chevrolet Aveo. Don’t look on this site for an Aveo review, because there isn’t one. I have driven a few versions of the Aveo. Back when running a small local dealership in Dallas we would stumble across an Aveo or two. This was always a tough sell as there was nothing particularly good about these cars, except maybe it’s price. I could never recommend it to anyone; not as a teenager’s first car or a cheap family car. There were just too many other products you could get that were much better.</p>
<p>Now we have the Sonic and GM says that it’s not really replacing the Aveo because it’s a whole new car. You see the Aveo was a car built by Daewoo and badged in the U.S. as a Chevrolet. The Sonic on the other hand is all Chevy and assembled in Michigan. So did Chevy do it right this time? Can I finally recommend a Chevrolet, compact hatchback, to friends and readers?<span id="more-3351"></span></p>
<p><img src="http://a8.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc7/423674_307906912588990_163259573720392_831957_309550696_n.jpg" width="150px"> <img src="http://a8.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/417923_307906955922319_163259573720392_831960_756895473_n.jpg" width="150px"> <img src="http://a6.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/420085_307903982589283_163259573720392_831845_190663674_n.jpg" width="150px"></p>
<p>Let’s start with the looks. The Sonic’s design was given high priority. With manufactures like Ford and Hyundai making not just good products but great designed compact cars, GM couldn’t afford getting it wrong. They haven’t disappointed either. The design is supposed to inspire sportiness and it’s said to be taken direction from motorcycles. I’ll have to say I really like the headlight and front fascia design. Looking from the side you can tell the car leans aggressively forward. This is no mistake as it’s given two character lines running from wheel to wheel showing off it’s aggressive stance.</p>
<p><img src="http://a2.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/417160_307906019255746_553272288_n.jpg" width="150px"> <img src="http://a8.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc7/428802_307906035922411_163259573720392_831929_2043985036_n.jpg" width="150px"> <img src="http://a5.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc7/423014_307906062589075_163259573720392_831931_1758847431_n.jpg" width="150px"></p>
<p>Step inside and you’ll notice that this is a budget car. Unlike the Hyundai Veloster that offers a big touchscreen with navigation on even it’s base model, the Sonic doesn’t even offer one on it’s top-of-the-line LTZ trim. No matter though, what you really want to be looking at is the gauge cluster. This is more styling taking from “sport-bikes” with a large tachometer showing your 6500 rpm redline. Beside the large tachometer is every other output displayed onto a LCD display.</p>
<p>The rest of the interior is designed well and you don’t automatically notice its cheapness. There are a lot of plastics used but GM did a good job of breaking up the interior and keeping the driver focused on driving.  In our tester we had cloth seats that were comfortable and supportive. There were a few times that I longed for leather/heated seats but after seeing the leather seats in the LTZ trim, I’ll stick with the cloth on this car.</p>
<p><img src="http://a2.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/402717_307906319255716_163259573720392_831942_442573594_n.jpg" width="150px"> <img src="http://a7.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc7/405618_307904902589191_163259573720392_831880_1374100610_n.jpg" width="150px"> <img src="http://a6.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc7/396290_307904875922527_163259573720392_831879_543325429_n.jpg" width="150px"></p>
<p>The Sonic comes with two different engine options. You can get a 1.8 liter 4 cylinder that pushes 138 horsepower matched up with either a 6-speed automatic or a 5-speed manual transmission. You can also get a 1.4 liter 4 cylinder turbocharged engine with the same 138 horsepower but torque is bumped from 125 lb-ft to 148. This engine can be matched to a 6-speed auto or a 6-speed manual. Our tester was equipped with the 1.4 turbo and a 6-speed manual, so we’re expecting some fun driving!</p>
<p><strong>Ride:</strong></p>
<p>Driving a car with a turbocharged, small displacement engine is a lot different than what I’m used to. Living in Texas our sports cars are equipped with big V8’s or V6’s with lots of low down power. The Sonic’s 1.4 turbo doesn’t have that kind of lowdown power on tap. Cruising down the highway in 6th gear at 70 mph is smooth and fine, but what if someone pulls out in front of you and you need to slow down a little. Slow from 70 to 55 mph and then put the peddle to the floor and you get nothing. No power. Drop a gear to 5th and you get the same result, now people behind you are getting frustrated. Drop it another gear and finally that turbo is spoiling and you can use that 138 hp. It’s the same story around town. Corners I’d normally take in 3rd gear in my car require 2nd in the Sonic.</p>
<p>You might be thinking that this is a slow and un-fun car to drive then. Well you’d be wrong. You just need to adjust your driving style to get the most power of the small engine. Keep the rpm’s above 2500 or 3000 and you’re good. Keep them at the top of 5000 rpm and you’re having a blast! I know 138 horsepower isn’t that much but the suspension and the chassis are tuned for cornering. You can toss this car into corners at speed and you don’t get wobbling body roll. You get decent grip and balanced, level cornering. The steering has good feel as well so it’s easy to predict the amount of lock needed to attack a corner. This would be a great weekend time-attack car.</p>
<p><strong>Economy:</strong></p>
<p>This is a small hatchback and many will buy it not just for the price or utility but also for its economy. Our tester with the 1.4 turbo engine and 6-speed manual transmission is ratted at 40 mpg highway and 29 mpg in the city. Overall, with our fun spirited driving style, we averaged 32.8 mpg. </p>
<p>The Sonic is light and small but feels more spacious inside. I can easily get out of the driver seat and sit in the back without having to adjust the seat and I’m 6’ 1”. The hatch has decent space too and it helps that the seats fold down. The biggest thing that bothered me was the size of the fuel tank. Although you get great fuel economy the tank is so small you’ll be filling up ever few days if you drive a decent amount a day.</p>
<p><strong>Comparison: </strong> </p>
<p><img src="http://sphotos.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash4/427641_307906895922325_163259573720392_831956_159930038_n.jpg" width="150px"> <img src="http://a4.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc7/422232_307906875922327_163259573720392_831955_7486679_n.jpg" width="150px"> <img src="http://a3.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/386274_296837703695911_163259573720392_807551_832284936_n.jpg" width="150px"></p>
<p>So the Sonic is giant leap above the outgoing Aveo and that’s great for GM, but how does it stack up to all the great compact hatches in the American market today?  We really like the new Ford Fiesta and the hot new Hyundai Veloster. Not just that but the Mazda 2, Suzuki SX4, Honda Fit, Kia Rio, and Hyundai Accent are all decent cars.</p>
<p>I think the Sonic can be thrown right up there with in the top 3. It’s got good looks, a good engine, and it’s great to drive. This could easily be a weekend time-attack car and still produce good economy on day-to-day runs.  My only slight reservation is on the price. When you’re comparing it to the likes of the Fiesta and the Veloster it’s priced similarly, but offers a little less as far as standard equipment. When you start looking at some of the others though, like the Mazda 2, you can find an economical and fun car for a lot cheaper.</p>
<p>Check out our full photo galleries on <a href="http://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.296837490362599.68725.163259573720392&#038;type=1" target="_blank" title="Chevy Sonic Turbo by txGarage on Facebook">Facebook</a> and <a href="https://plus.google.com/photos/114211521143782375203/albums/5702459359433924801" title="Photo gallery on Google Plus by txGarage of the 2012 Chevrolet Sonic Turbo" target="_blank">Google+</a></p>
<p>Subscribe to us on <a href="http://youtube.com/texasgarage" target="_blank">YouTube</a>!!!</p>
<p><iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/sbKr6rzSdYY" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://txgarage.com/2012/01/sonic-the-turbo-review-of-the-2012-chevrolet-sonic-1lt-turbo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quick Drive: 2012 Hyundai Veloster</title>
		<link>http://txgarage.com/2011/11/quick-drive-2012-hyundai-veloster/</link>
		<comments>http://txgarage.com/2011/11/quick-drive-2012-hyundai-veloster/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 14:00:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam Moore</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Car Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quick Drive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 hyundai veloster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blue link]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bluelink]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[first drive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FirstDrive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hyundai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[john krafcik]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quick drive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telematics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Veloster]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://txgarage.com/?p=3023</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I’ve always been a big fan of small, sporty hatchbacks. As a matter of fact, as many of our readers might already know, my first car was an 88 Honda Civic hatch. My next car was an 88 Acura Integra Special. They were both great little cars and lots of fun to drive. In the past few months, we’ve driven a slew of new, small, sporty cars that look to reinvigorate the compact car in America including the Ford Fiesta, Mazda 2, Honda Civic Coupe, Kia Forte 5, Fiat 500, Scion tC, and Suzuki SX4. While I like all of these cars for their own reasons, I think that the Ford Fiesta is one of the best. When I first read about the Hyundai Veloster, I already knew that it’s toughest competition would be coming from Ford with the Fiesta. So let’s see how it stacks up. <a href="http://txgarage.com/2011/11/quick-drive-2012-hyundai-veloster/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://txgarage.com/images//2011/11/2012-Hyundai_Veloster-top.jpeg" alt="" title="2012-Hyundai_Veloster-top" width="580" height="310" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3026" /></p>
<p>I’ve always been a big fan of small, sporty hatchbacks. As a matter of fact, as many of our readers might already know, my first car was an 88 Honda Civic hatch. My next car was an 88 Acura Integra Special. They were both great little cars and lots of fun to drive. In the past few months, we’ve driven a slew of new, small, sporty cars that look to reinvigorate the compact car in America including the <a href="http://txgarage.com/2011/07/full-review-2011-ford-fiesta/" title="Full Review 2011 Ford Fiesta" target="_blank">Ford Fiesta</a>, <a href="http://txgarage.com/2011/12/2012-mazda-2-full-review/" title="2012 Mazda 2 Full Review:">Mazda 2</a>, <a href="http://txgarage.com/2011/11/the-2012-honda-civic-coupe-reviewed/" title="The 2012 Honda Civic Coupe Reviewed" target="_blank">Honda Civic Coupe</a>, <a href="http://txgarage.com/2011/06/quick-drive-2011-kia-forte-5/" title="Quick Drive: 2011 Kia Forte 5" target="_blank">Kia Forte 5</a>, <a href="http://txgarage.com/2011/08/quick-drive-2012-fiat-500/" title="Quick Drive: 2012 Fiat 500" target="_blank">Fiat 500</a>, <a href="http://txgarage.com/2011/07/2011-scion-tc-extended-review/" title="2011 Scion tC extended review:" target="_blank">Scion tC</a>, and <a href="http://txgarage.com/2010/05/review-the-2010-suzuki-sx4-sportback/" title="Review: The 2010 Suzuki SX4 SportBack" target="_blank">Suzuki SX4</a>. While I like all of these cars for their own reasons, I think that the Ford Fiesta is one of the best. When I first read about the Hyundai Veloster, I already knew that it’s toughest competition would be coming from Ford with the Fiesta. So let’s see how it stacks up.<span id="more-3023"></span></p>
<p>One of the first questions the Hyundai representative asked me as we took our first walk-around was what I thought this car looked like or if it reminded me of anything. Honestly, the only thing that comes to mind nowadays is Hyundai. It looks like a Hyundai, and that’s no longer a bad thing. The front end shares it’s lines and design with the new Elantra, which is a great looking car for it’s class. It’s an aggressive and modern design that really fits this crazy little hatch.</p>
<p>Why do I say crazy? Well when most car companies show off a concept car with a radical design like having 3 doors &#8211; two on the passenger side and one on the driver side &#8211; you don’t really expect them to keep that design when bringing the car to the market. Well Hyundai has done just that. This is the first ever 3 door hatchback. Looking at it from the drivers side, it has a coupe like design and look. From the passenger side, it looks like a modern 4 door hatch. Around the back is a sleek hatchback with center exiting exhaust. Our test car was fitted with 18-inch alloy wheels that added to its sporty looks.</p>
<p>[SinglePic not found] [SinglePic not found] [SinglePic not found]</p>
<div class="clear"></div>
<p>Inside the car is the most advanced, standard interior in the Veloster’s market. Our test car was equipped with leather seats, navigation, and Hyundai’s new blueLink. All but the leather seats come standard. The blueLink system was pretty cool and I had nowhere near enough time to play with it all. The system powers Hyundai’s voice response system, enhanced navigation services, and emergency assistance. It also has a music management system, iPod connectivity, Pandora radio, and games you can play with your fuel economy. Cool stuff for the iPad/iPod youth.</p>
<p>[SinglePic not found] [SinglePic not found] [SinglePic not found]</p>
<div class="clear"></div>
<p>So it’s nice and sporty looking and it’s got a great  interior with some cool technology, but does it live up to the sporty looks? The Veloster is powered by a lightweight, all-aluminum 1.6 liter GDi (gasoline direct injection) engine. It comes attached to either a 6-speed manual or 6-speed automatic transmission. The automatic is a dual-clutch setup that puts paddle shifters on the steering wheel. We drove the manual transmission and for a car that can get 40 mpg, it was pretty good. I would have liked the clutch to be a little heavier and have sharper gear changes, but it was still pretty well sorted and wouldn’t wear you out driving in heavy traffic. I didn’t get a chance to drive an automatic, but I’ve heard that’s really the one to get. The dual-clutch shifts smoothly and you still get outstanding fuel economy. We’ll reserve judgment till we get to spend some time in one.</p>
<p>The power in from the 1.6 liter engine is only 138 horsepower, but the lightweight Veloster uses it well. The steering is sharp and predictable, so keeping this in a low gear with high revs through twisty roads is a lot of fun.</p>
<p>After leaving the car for the day, I was left thinking that the Ford Fiesta really has some steep competition. The Veloster we tested was top of the line and topped out just over $22k. When we reviewed the Fiesta, by far one of the most expensive and nicely equipped cars in it’s class, came in at just over $24k. The Veloster’s interior was just as nice, if not more so and it gets better gas mileage than the Fiesta topping 40 mpg in any trim. Hyundai also has one of the best warranties offered by any manufacturer and the cars really are being built well. This car is now one of my favorite compact cars on the market today. It does everything a hot-hatch is supposed to do, and does them all well. If you plan on test driving any of the other before mentioned cars, this is definitely worth a look.</p>
<p>Check out our photo gallery on <a href="http://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.258799697499712.62256.163259573720392&#038;type=1" title="2012 Hyundai Veloster photo gallery by txGarage - on Facebook" target="_blank">Facebook</a> or <a href="https://plus.google.com/photos/112993089674908320639/albums/5677876969657311857" title="2012 Hyundai Veloster photo gallery by txGarage - on google ">Google</a>:</p>
[Gallery not found]
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://txgarage.com/2011/11/quick-drive-2012-hyundai-veloster/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quick Drive: 2011 Honda Civic</title>
		<link>http://txgarage.com/2011/08/quick-drive-2011-honda-civic/</link>
		<comments>http://txgarage.com/2011/08/quick-drive-2011-honda-civic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Aug 2011 16:38:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam Moore</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Car Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quick Drive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2011 honda civic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Auto Roundup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[first drive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[honda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quick drive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[texas auto writers association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[texas motor speedway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tms]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://txgarage.com/?p=2789</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you read our Quick Drive of the 2011 Kia Forte 5, then you really already know what my opinion is about the Honda Civic. My first car was an 88 Civic hatch and I remember the time when the Civic was the car to own because it was cheap and the engine was sporty and almost bulletproof. I guess the problem could be nostalgia, but the Civic just hasn’t done it for me with its last few generations, and I hear the same around the water-cooler. The Civic now demands a premium on its price, it’s heavier, and the engine just doesn’t feel as peppy or rev-happy as it once did. Worst of all, as manufactures like Kia, Hyundai, and Ford have been making great compact cars lately, it seems like Honda has dropped the ball altogether. The interior isn’t up to par, the ride isn’t up to par, and the sportiness is no longer up to par. <a href="http://txgarage.com/2011/08/quick-drive-2011-honda-civic/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_2817" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 590px"><img src="http://txgarage.com/images//2011/08/2011-honda-civic.jpg" alt="2011 Honda Civic at the Texas Auto Roundup" title="2011-honda-civic" width="580" height="204" class="size-full wp-image-2817" /><p class="wp-caption-text">2011 Honda Civic at the Texas Auto Roundup</p></div>
<p>If you read our Quick Drive of the <a href="http://txgarage.com/2011/06/quick-drive-2011-kia-forte-5/" title="2011 Kia Forte 5 quick drive review by txGarage">2011 Kia Forte 5</a>, then you really already know what my opinion is about the Honda Civic. My first car was an 88 Civic hatch and I remember the time when the Civic was the car to own because it was cheap and the engine was sporty and almost bulletproof.</p>
<p>I guess the problem could be nostalgia, but the Civic just hasn’t done it for me with its last few generations, and I hear the same around the water-cooler. The Civic now demands a premium on its price, it’s heavier, and the engine just doesn’t feel as peppy or rev-happy as it once did. Worst of all, as manufactures like <a href="http://txgarage.com/tag/kia/" title="Kia on txGarage">Kia</a>, <a href="http://txgarage.com/tag/hyundai/" title="Hyundai on txGarage">Hyundai</a>, and <a href="http://txGarage.com/tag/ford/" title="Ford on txGarage">Ford</a> have been making great compact cars lately, it seems like Honda has dropped the ball altogether. The interior isn’t up to par, the ride isn’t up to par, and the sportiness is no longer up to par.</p>
<p>I know the one Civic to drive is the Si and I’m looking forward to getting the chance to drive one, but it still seems that the Civic lost something. I hope that in the next generation or so, they find it again.<span id="more-2789"></span></p>
<p>Car was driven and reviewed by Adam Moore at the Texas Auto Roundup in conjunction with the <a href="http://www.texasautowriters.org/">Texas Auto Writers Association</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://txgarage.com/2011/08/quick-drive-2011-honda-civic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quick Drive: 2011 Kia Optima Turbo</title>
		<link>http://txgarage.com/2011/08/quick-drive-2011-kia-optima-turbo/</link>
		<comments>http://txgarage.com/2011/08/quick-drive-2011-kia-optima-turbo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Aug 2011 16:27:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam Moore</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Car Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quick Drive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2011 Kia Optima Tubro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Auto Roundup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[first drive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Optima]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quick drive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[texas auto writers association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[texas motor speedway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[turbo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://txgarage.com/?p=2791</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We reviewed the 2011 Kia Optima about a month ago, and I still maintain that for the price, it’s one of the best looking cars you can get right now. We already felt like the 2.4 liter engine in the Optima we drove then was pretty peppy, but I wouldn’t consider it fast car. Now with a 2.0 liter turbocharged engine, let’s see what we think. <a href="http://txgarage.com/2011/08/quick-drive-2011-kia-optima-turbo/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_2814" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 590px"><img src="http://txgarage.com/images//2011/08/2011-Kia-Optima-Turbo-Top.jpg" alt="The 2011 Kia Optima Turbo at the Texas Auto Roundup" title="2011-Kia-Optima-Turbo-Top" width="580" height="223" class="size-full wp-image-2814" /><p class="wp-caption-text">The 2011 Kia Optima Turbo at the Texas Auto Roundup</p></div>
<p>We reviewed the <a href="http://txgarage.com/2011/04/2011-kia-optima-reviewed/" title="2011 Kia Optima full review by txGarage">2011 Kia Optima</a> a few months back, and I still maintain that for the price, it’s one of the best looking cars you can get right now. We already felt like the 2.4 liter engine in the Optima we drove then was pretty peppy, but I wouldn’t consider it fast car. Now with a 2.0 liter turbocharged engine, let’s see what we think.</p>
<p>The turbo engine in this Optima is the same basic setup that you get in cars like the Genesis Coupe and Sonata turbo. This setup pushes out 274 horsepower and is only matched up to 6-speed automatic transmission in the Optima.  You also get a slightly different body kit and wheels with the turbo model showing off the fact that you’re in something a little more special.<span id="more-2791"></span></p>
<p>Basically, the driving dynamics and overall feel of the car haven’t changed, but you do get a sportier feel from the engine. At a price starting at $26,200, it just gives me more reasons to really like this car.</p>
[Gallery not found]
<p>Thanks to our friends at <a href="http://notstockphotography.smugmug.com/Events/TAWA-Auto-Roundup/16900297_VnckD4#1276889277_M6tMV3n">Non-Stock Photography</a> for the photos.</p>
<p>Car was driven and reviewed by Adam Moore at the Texas Auto Roundup in conjunction with the <a href="http://www.texasautowriters.org/">Texas Auto Writers Association</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://txgarage.com/2011/08/quick-drive-2011-kia-optima-turbo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quick Drive: 2012 Fiat 500</title>
		<link>http://txgarage.com/2011/08/quick-drive-2012-fiat-500/</link>
		<comments>http://txgarage.com/2011/08/quick-drive-2012-fiat-500/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2011 16:19:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam Moore</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Car Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quick Drive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[500]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Auto Roundup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chrysler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fiat 500]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[first drive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quick drive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[texas auto writers association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[texas motor speedway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tms]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://txgarage.com/?p=2784</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After Fiat bought out Chrysler to up its stake in the company, Fiat knows it has a lasting presence in America. The plan is to rollout the entire Fiat line-up to the U.S. market, starting with the Fiat 500. As the ambassador to the brand then, the 500 really needs to be a big hit for Fiat. So what did we think? <a href="http://txgarage.com/2011/08/quick-drive-2012-fiat-500/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_2811" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 590px"><img src="http://txgarage.com/images//2011/08/fiat-500-top.jpg" alt="2012 Fiat 500 at the Texas Auto Roundup " title="fiat-500-top" width="580" height="219" class="size-full wp-image-2811" /><p class="wp-caption-text">2012 Fiat 500 at the Texas Auto Roundup </p></div>
<p>After Fiat bought out <a href="http://txgarage.com/tag/chrysler/" title="Chrysler on txGarage">Chrysler</a> to up its stake in the company, Fiat knows it has a lasting presence in America. The plan is to rollout the entire Fiat line-up to the U.S. market, starting with the Fiat 500. As the ambassador to the brand then, the 500 really needs to be a big hit for Fiat. So what did we think?</p>
<p>First of all, I wasn’t really impressed with the interior of the 500. I know it’s a lower end car, but it reminded me too much of the PT Cruiser’s interior, and that’s not a good thing. There are big plastic panels along the door and the dash, optioned with different colors no less. One more complaint before I move on; I didn’t get a lot of time to try and adjust the seat, so it could be that, but the pedals didn’t feel right against my feet. I was fortunate enough to score a manual transmission, but it felt like my feet were straight up and down while doing foot work. It was actually uncomfortable.<span id="more-2784"></span></p>
<p>On to the good stuff! The steering in this little car was pretty impressive. It had a nice, direct feel. With the wheels being pushed to the far corners, you get a good sense of weight distribution, which means driving this little thing quickly around corners felt sporty. The 1.4 liter engine pushing its massive 101 horsepower felt peppy and eager. I’d really like to get it up on the highway and see how it handles in mad, Dallas traffic, but we’ll have to do that another time.</p>
<p>In Europe, this car sells on its heritage from the 50’s and 70’s, but buyers in America don’t have that heritage to look back onto. The 500 over here needs to stand on its own and be a good enough car for people to drop the $16,000 necessary to get a base car. In my opinion, it doesn’t do that. The Fiesta is a much better choice at a much better price. The 500 I’m sure will sell well, but if it was my money, I couldn’t buy one.</p>
[Gallery not found]
<p>Thanks to our friends at <a href="http://notstockphotography.smugmug.com/Events/TAWA-Auto-Roundup/16900297_VnckD4#1276889277_M6tMV3n">Non-Stock Photography</a> for the photos.</p>
<p>Car was driven and reviewed by Adam Moore at the Texas Auto Roundup in conjunction with the <a href="http://www.texasautowriters.org/">Texas Auto Writers Association</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://txgarage.com/2011/08/quick-drive-2012-fiat-500/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quick Drive: 2011 Infiniti G37 IPL</title>
		<link>http://txgarage.com/2011/08/quick-drive-2011-infiniti-g37-ipl/</link>
		<comments>http://txgarage.com/2011/08/quick-drive-2011-infiniti-g37-ipl/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 15:48:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam Moore</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Car Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quick Drive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2011 Infiniti]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2012 Infiniti]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Auto Roundup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[first drive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[G37 ipl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infiniti g37]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infiniti performance line]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Infiniti review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infinity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IPL Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quick drive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[texas auto writers association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[texas motor speedway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tms]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://txgarage.com/?p=2787</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Our friend at Reflections of a Drive did a real good full review of this car a few weeks before the Auto Roundup. It really got me excited to drive this car and see what’s what compared to the regular G37 and the Genesis Coupe I drive as a daily driver.

First of all, you can’t deny that the G37 is a pretty car. The extras that go into making the IPL, or Infinity Performance Line, just make it look that much more aggressive. Bigger wheels and brakes and the more aggressive body kit let other enthusiast know you’re rolling in something a little special. <a href="http://txgarage.com/2011/08/quick-drive-2011-infiniti-g37-ipl/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_2807" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 590px"><img src="http://txgarage.com/images//2011/08/g37-ipl-top.jpg" alt="2011 Infiniti G37 IPL at the Texas Auto Roundup" title="g37-ipl-top" width="580" height="228" class="size-full wp-image-2807" /><p class="wp-caption-text">2011 Infiniti G37 IPL at the Texas Auto Roundup</p></div>
<p>Our friend at Reflections of the Drive did a real good <a href="http://www.ReflectionsOfTheDrive.com/reviews/2011ipl/" title="Full review of the 2011 Infiniti G37 IPL by Reflections of the Drive" target="_blank">full review</a> of this car a few weeks before the Auto Roundup. It really got me excited to drive this car and see what’s what compared to the regular G37 and the Genesis Coupe I drive as a daily driver.</p>
<p>First of all, you can’t deny that the G37 is a pretty car. The extras that go into making the IPL, or Infinity Performance Line, just make it look that much more aggressive. Bigger wheels and brakes and the more aggressive body kit let other enthusiast know you’re rolling in something a little special.<span id="more-2787"></span></p>
<p>The IPL boosts horsepower output from 325 to 348, but the power isn’t the first thing you’ll notice when driving this car. First, you notice the retuned suspension giving this once luxury car a real sports car feel. You stay more flat through the turns and feel much more of what&#8217;s happening on the road below.<br />
The real reason for the IPL existing at all is to give Infiniti that M-like division focusing on sports cars. I think it’s worked out for them so far as the G37 IPL is a great ride. At a cost starting at $48,900 and with all the competition out there, I’m not sure I’d shell out my money on this car.</p>
[Gallery not found]
<p>Thanks to our friends at <a href="http://notstockphotography.smugmug.com/Events/TAWA-Auto-Roundup/16900297_VnckD4#1276889277_M6tMV3n">Non-Stock Photography</a> for the photos.</p>
<p>Car was driven and reviewed by Adam Moore at the Texas Auto Roundup in conjunction with the <a href="http://www.texasautowriters.org/">Texas Auto Writers Association</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://txgarage.com/2011/08/quick-drive-2011-infiniti-g37-ipl/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quick Drive: 2011 Hyundai Genesis Coupe Track 3.8</title>
		<link>http://txgarage.com/2011/06/quick-drive-2011-hyundai-genesis-coupe-track-3-8/</link>
		<comments>http://txgarage.com/2011/06/quick-drive-2011-hyundai-genesis-coupe-track-3-8/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 12:44:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam Moore</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Car Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quick Drive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2011 Hyundai Genesis Coupe Track]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Auto Roundup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[first drive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genesis coupe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Genesis R-Spec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hyundai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quick drive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[R]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[r-spec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RSpec]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[texas auto writers association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[texas motor speedway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tms]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://txgarage.com/?p=2658</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let me start this out by saying, if you are in the market for a rear-wheel-drive coupe that looks great, performs great, and doesn’t kill your pocketbook at least test drive the Genesis Coupe. I did, and bought one. I personally own a 3.8 V6 Grand Touring. I bought that model because everything I read about the Track model said it was too harsh for everyday driving. I’m extremely happy with my purchase and love my car, but can’t help but want to put the Track model on the track! <a href="http://txgarage.com/2011/06/quick-drive-2011-hyundai-genesis-coupe-track-3-8/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_2685" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 593px"><a href="http://txgarage.com/images//2011/06/NotStockPhotography0502116082-M.jpg" rel="lightbox[2658]" title="NotStockPhotography0502116082-M"><img src="http://txgarage.com/images//2011/06/NotStockPhotography0502116082-M.jpg" alt="2011 Hyundai Genesis Coupe 3.8 Track R-Spec" title="NotStockPhotography0502116082-M" width="583" height="155" class="size-full wp-image-2685" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">2011 Hyundai Genesis Coupe 3.8 Track</p></div>
<p>Let me start this out by saying, if you are in the market for a rear-wheel-drive coupe that looks great, performs great, and doesn’t kill your pocketbook at least test drive the Genesis Coupe. I did, and bought one. I personally own a <a href="http://txgarage.com/2010/10/the-hyundai-genesis-coupe-the-new-grand-touring/" title="genesis coupe">3.8 V6 Grand Touring</a>. I bought that model because everything I read about the Track model said it was too harsh for everyday driving. I’m extremely happy with my purchase and love my car, but can’t help but want to put the Track model on the track!<span id="more-2658"></span></p>
<p>This yellow coupe definitely stands out from the crowd. I had it in my eyes set on it from the get go and as soon as I saw it open I was going to jump in it. Then disaster, the Genesis was pulled into the garage after running off the track. There was talk about not letting anyone else drive it, but it ended up being ok. Alas it scared the people at Hyundai so much that they restricted it to private roads only, so no track time.</p>
<p>So to the street we go. First things first, yes this car has some tight suspension but boy does it grip and go, staying flat around the corners. The power is the same as my grand touring but the way it’s put to the ground with the limited-slip differential gives you that extra kick. The shifter seems a little more crisp too, this could be because it’s a 2011 and mine is 2010 or it might just have an upgraded shifter, I’m not really sure.</p>
<p>Overall I think I made the right choice with the Grand Touring over the Track model. Its more composed and comfortable for everyday driving, but man do I wish I had an open track to take this car out on.</p>
[Gallery not found]
<p>Thanks to our friends at <a href="http://notstockphotography.smugmug.com/Events/TAWA-Auto-Roundup/16900297_VnckD4#1276889277_M6tMV3n">Non-Stock Photography</a> for the photos.</p>
<p>Car was driven and reviewed by Adam Moore at the Texas Auto Roundup in conjunction with the <a href="http://www.texasautowriters.org/">Texas Auto Writers Association</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://txgarage.com/2011/06/quick-drive-2011-hyundai-genesis-coupe-track-3-8/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quick Drive: 2012 Acura TL</title>
		<link>http://txgarage.com/2011/06/quick-drive-2012-acura-tl/</link>
		<comments>http://txgarage.com/2011/06/quick-drive-2012-acura-tl/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 17:36:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam Moore</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Car Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quick Drive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2011 Acura TL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Auto Roundup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[first drive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[on the track]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paddle shift]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quick drive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Racing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sport shift]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[texas auto writers association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[texas motor speedway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[track]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tsx]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://txgarage.com/?p=2656</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We haven’t had much interest in Acura over the past few years, although I owned an Integra back in the day, but we’ve tested a few cars that compare to this so we thought we’d jump right in. Also we drove the new TSX real quick at the Main Street in Motion event and were pretty impressed with it. <a href="http://txgarage.com/2011/06/quick-drive-2012-acura-tl/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_2683" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 597px"><a href="http://txgarage.com/images//2011/06/2011-Acura-TL.jpg" rel="lightbox[2656]" title="2011 Acura TL"><img src="http://txgarage.com/images//2011/06/2011-Acura-TL.jpg" alt="2011 Acura TL on the track!" title="2011 Acura TL" width="587" height="192" class="size-full wp-image-2683" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">2011 Acura TL on the track!</p></div>
<p>We haven’t had much interest in Acura over the past few years, although I owned an Integra back in the day, but we’ve tested a few cars that compare to this so we thought we’d jump right in. Also we drove the new TSX real quick at the <a href="http://txgarage.com/main-street-in-motion-dfw" title="Main Street in Motion">Main Street in Motion</a> event and were pretty impressed with it.<span id="more-2656"></span></p>
<p>For 2012 Acura toned back the styling of the TL, which was a good thing. Inside the Acura was nice luxury and great materials. One thing Acura has been known for is packing their cars with advanced technology. We didn’t get the chance to really sit down and mess with everything packed into this car but we can tell you it was a lot.</p>
<p>The TL was one of the cars we did take out on the infield track. It’s equipped with a 6-speed multi-clutch automatic transmission and features a rev-matching downshift, so we really wanted to check it out. I was not disappointed. The steering was really balanced and although this car did have some lean to it, it was never too much. The shifting and getting the power to the wheels is really where this TL shined on the track. It was by far the best car quipped with an automatic transmission that we drove on the track that day.</p>
[Gallery not found]
<p>Thanks to our friends at <a href="http://notstockphotography.smugmug.com/Events/TAWA-Auto-Roundup/16900297_VnckD4#1276889277_M6tMV3n">Non-Stock Photography</a> for the photos.</p>
<p>Car was driven and reviewed by Adam Moore at the Texas Auto Roundup in conjunction with the <a href="http://www.texasautowriters.org/">Texas Auto Writers Association</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://txgarage.com/2011/06/quick-drive-2012-acura-tl/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quick Drive: 2011 Volkswagen Jetta</title>
		<link>http://txgarage.com/2011/06/quick-drive-2011-volkswagen-jetta/</link>
		<comments>http://txgarage.com/2011/06/quick-drive-2011-volkswagen-jetta/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 12:32:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Adam Moore</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Car Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Quick Drive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2011]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2011 VW Jetta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Auto Roundup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[first drive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jetta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quick drive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[taw]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[texas auto writers association]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[texas motor speedway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[volkswagen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://txgarage.com/?p=2660</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For 2011 Volkswagen has reinvented the Jetta, for better or worse. For 2011 the Jetta is bigger, wider, longer but also cheaper. How did VW do this? Well the suspension components are cheaper and an older design than the previous generation. The quality of materials inside the car is also cheaper than that of the previous generation. It’s hard to see how this is a winning combination but Volkswagen has already seen lots of success with in sales with the new Jetta. <a href="http://txgarage.com/2011/06/quick-drive-2011-volkswagen-jetta/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_2680" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 600px"><a href="http://txgarage.com/images//2011/06/2011-VW-Jetta-top.jpg" rel="lightbox[2660]" title="2011-VW-Jetta-top"><img src="http://txgarage.com/images//2011/06/2011-VW-Jetta-top.jpg" alt="2011 Volkswagen Jetta - blue - Texas Auto Roundup" title="2011-VW-Jetta-top" width="590" height="195" class="size-full wp-image-2680" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">2011 Volkswagen Jetta - blue - Texas Auto Roundup</p></div>
<p>For 2011 Volkswagen has reinvented the Jetta, for better or worse. For 2011 the Jetta is bigger, wider, longer but also cheaper. How did VW do this? Well the suspension components are cheaper and an older design than the previous generation. The quality of materials inside the car is also cheaper than that of the previous generation. It’s hard to see how this is a winning combination but Volkswagen has already seen lots of success with in sales with the new Jetta.<span id="more-2660"></span></p>
<p>So how did it drive? It was fine. It drove about as well as a Kia Optima or a Chevrolet Malibu, it just didn’t feel special. The looks are okay, but not as outgoing as the Kia and the interior is okay, but not as nice as new Ford or even Hyundai cars that compete with the Jetta. So it’s an okay car, but doesn’t seem as special as its growing competition.</p>
<div id="attachment_2681" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 110px"><a href="http://txgarage.com/images//2011/06/NotStockPhotography0502115453-M.jpg" rel="lightbox[2660]" title="NotStockPhotography0502115453-M"><img src="http://txgarage.com/images//2011/06/NotStockPhotography0502115453-M-100x100.jpg" alt="2011 Volkswagen Jetta - blue - Texas Auto Roundup" title="NotStockPhotography0502115453-M" width="100" height="100" class="size-thumbnail wp-image-2681" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">2011 Volkswagen Jetta - blue - Texas Auto Roundup</p></div>
<p>Thanks to our friends at <a href="http://notstockphotography.smugmug.com/Events/TAWA-Auto-Roundup/16900297_VnckD4#1276889277_M6tMV3n">Non-Stock Photography</a> for the photos.</p>
<p>Car was driven and reviewed by Adam Moore at the Texas Auto Roundup in conjunction with the <a href="http://www.texasautowriters.org/">Texas Auto Writers Association</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://txgarage.com/2011/06/quick-drive-2011-volkswagen-jetta/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  txgarage.com/tag/first-drive/feed/ ) in 0.55327 seconds, on Feb 8th, 2012 at 9:27 pm UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 8th, 2012 at 10:27 pm UTC -->
