Connect with us

Volvo XC90 Recharge – MISSING THE MARK

Car Reviews

Volvo XC90 Recharge – MISSING THE MARK

Volvo XC90 Recharge – 

MISSING THE MARK


Baby Boomers recall with ease the best line of TV’s comedic super-spy, Maxwell Smart. “Missed it by thaaat much” was the punchline for many a Smart scheme gone awry.

Max, meet the Volvo XC90 plug-in hybrid, the Inscription Recharge.

This is not to imply that Volvo’s luxurious, three-row SUV is a bad car. Indeed, with brilliant engineering, crisp handling, lush materials, attention to detail throughout, and world-best safety, the $65,000 – $77,000 XC90 Recharge is worthy of its flagship status.

In general, I agree with my more knowledgeable colleague, David Boldt, who maintains that being inside a XC90 is a rewarding experience because of its roomy, well-appointed, and airy cabin. Large windows and reduced pillars make it easy for everyone to enjoy the view.

But it could be a little better.

Gas + electric = zoom

A big believer in plug-in hybrids, which charge up overnight via a 110 outlet and deliver all-electric performance before giving way to gas-electric propulsion, we were soooo excited to hear an XC90 recharge was headed our way.

The top of the Volvo line takes the most powerful gas-only drivetrain, a 316 hp, supercharged 2.0-liter turbocharged 4 and adds electric motors front and rear. Combined, the system delivers 400 hp and, more importantly, 472 lb-ft of silky, head-snapping torque. All XC90 engine variants are paired to Volvo’s slick 8-speed transmission and can tow up 5,000 lbs. 

Zero to 60 comes in 4.9 seconds and 100 mph in 12.9. Passing is ridiculously easy. It takes less than 4 seconds to jump from 50 to 70 mph. Volvo claims the top speed is 140 mph. We’ll take their word.

As impressive as those numbers seem, the XC90 Recharge is a hair slower than BMW’s similarly priced X5 xDrive45e, which hits 60 in 4.7 seconds and 100 in 12.8. If it’s speed you want in this class, move up to the $98,000 Porsche Cayenne, which hits 60 in 4.2 seconds and 100 in 10.6.

It is hard to say which has better braking. In testing by Car and Driver, the X5 came to halt from 70 mph in 156 feet, compared to 188 feet for the Volvo. Consumer Reports, on the other hand, said the XC90 stopped from 60 mph in 126 feet, three feet short of the X5.

The real issue here, though, is the plug-in. Volvo says it will deliver 20 miles of electric driving, but we got – at best – 18. Moreover, when asked to accelerate onto a freeway, the electric motors needed help from the gas engine.  Overall, we averaged around 21.3 mpg, a slight improvement from the non-hybrid version.

Great, not excellent handling

The XC90’s power is exquisitely managed by Volvo’s always-firm suspension and supplanted by nicely weighted steering. The three-ton, 195-inch SUV is nimbler than one would expect, given its dimensions. Quick, emergency maneuvers are handled with aplomb, building driver confidence.

The trade-off is that like all Volvos when the road is rough, the ride is rough. Oh, it would be perfectly fine on a perfectly smooth Swedish highway, but this is Texas, the king of chip-sealing worn-out highways. Here, Volvo’s flagship rides loud and bumpy.

One can move up to a more comfortable air suspension, which critics praise, but that involves choosing the premier R-Design, which starts at $70,595, and then selecting the 4-corner Air Suspension package ($1,800). You’ll probably want the upgraded ECM, Polestar Performance ($1,295). Now you’re within dollars of the BMW, which can be supported by 384 U.S. dealers, compared to 287 for Volvo.

Little things

Power and maneuverability make the XC90 Recharge a pleasure to drive, but a lot of little things are aggravating.

The voice command system, for example, is lovely for setting cabin temperature and radio stations, but using it for navigation is like talking to a deaf uncle.

“I want to go to Marshall Street in Longview.”
“Did you say Marsh Avenue?
“No,” (speaking slower than a turtle), “Marshall Street in Longview.”
“Ok. Setting destination for Macy Square on Long Island.”

And then there is the 12-inch center infotainment center with swipe screens. One can have a rather significant wreck trying to figure out how to turn on the rear window defroster. That’s misleading. I finally just got out and wiped the thing, and the side mirrors, which also had defrosters whose operation required a degree from something other than a state university.

Similarly, the lane-keep assist is a crapshoot. The system veers from one side marker into the other, where it may – or may not – correct itself. On several occasions it just rolled over a side marker and headed for a ditch. It handles a curve about as well as Tim Tebow.

And that’s the story of the XC90. The current iteration has been in production since 2015, and in those six years Volvo has failed to work out the bugs. Consumer Reports does not recommend it based on continuing problems in the drive system, suspension, brakes, body integrity and power equipment.
Missed it by thaaat much.

In four decades of journalism, Bill Owney has picked up awards for his coverage of everything from murders to the NFL to state and local government. He added the automotive world to his portfolio in the mid '90s.

1 Comment

1 Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

More in Car Reviews

Looking for local events?
Check out our Event Calendar!

Subscribe to our mailing list and get interesting content and updates from TXGARAGE to your email inbox.

epidemic sound affiliate link

Soundtrack like a pro, without breaking the bank.
MUSIC FOR CONTENT CREATORS

To Top